CIC 2004 HOME
Page 4 of 6

Wednesday, Feb. 4 - "Turbulent Times... Where are the answers?" - Rob Light, CAA

The real revelation, which won’t surprise this room is that by the time they are older teens online takes over, with more than 21 percent of older teens spending more than four hours a day online. Online is the radio station for these teens, and online will be the radio station for an even bigger population in the near future because we are a society that wants what it wants, when it wants it.

And what about those over 30 and even more so, over 40? Billboard tells us that the majority of CDs are sold to people over 25. There was one week late last year where 11 of the Top 50 albums were recorded by artists over 40 and that 35 percent of the albums were bought by consumers who had also celebrated
that birthday. Artists like Simon & Garfunkel, Michael McDonald, Rod Stewart and Bette Midler were part of that group.

It is a fact that 4 million people turn 50 every year, and consumers over 50 spent $400 billion. The biggest growth in movie ticket sales are among men and women over 40. By 2010, more than half of the population will be 40 or above.

What do we learn in this Readers Digest version of demographics? Older people want to be young, younger people want to act older, we are demolishing traditional stages of life, shortening childhood, rushing adolescence, demanding more of young adulthood and middle age now reaches until you’re 60.

The interesting thing about all the money spent on research, and all the information we try to gather, is that it is truly at our fingertips.

There are few assistants who work in any promoter’s office, agency or label who can afford to buy a concert ticket. Ask them what they think. While we debate the difference between $37.50 and $41.50, they are laughing to themselves that they can’t afford $25.

Next time you go to the dentist, ask the hygienist with two kids why she skipped taking her kids to a show. Ask any of your non-industry friends what they listen to, what they read, what they watch – a frightening exercise. Yet, put Simon & Garfunkel on TV for a week, send a clear message of what the show will be and, to that specific audience, price is irrelevant.

My point is that we can no longer address our issues as generic conversations spread across a mass audience.
Are ticket prices too high?

When they are $40 and your audience is 18 to 24, and you are on your first CD, you bet. Let’s try to find the answers in truly tackling an issue and not a political statement that sounds cool in a panel.

So, I reiterate: We lump groups together and try to talk to them as if they are one group, residing in the traditional ways of communicating with our audience (even when we think we are being creative). Yet we all know, whatever age group we are trying to reach, they are not where we think they are.

They do not listen to the radio the way they used to, they do not read the paper the way they used to, they no longer watch TV the way they used to. Yet, still we spend countless dollars trying to reach them in that space.

In a world where a movie studio might spend upward of $8 million launching a film on opening weekend, we are begging labels for a few hundred thousand for a multi-month campaign, or trying to put tickets on sale for $20 or $30 in the face of competition from movies, clubs, sporting events, the Internet and hanging out.

Interestingly, last summer I had breakfast with a reporter in Los Angeles who writes for The New York Times and covers entertainment with great passion and proclaims to love music. I was bemoaning how hard it was to talk to the 18- to 35-year-old audience.

Specifically, I was discussing matchbox twenty, a great live act who, on their previous tour, had done basically sellout business in arenas and here they were, touring on a new CD behind their second Top 10 single, and business was way off from the last tour.

She told me she was a big fan of the band and would love to see them when they got to L.A. She asked when they were going to be in town. I informed her they were coming in about seven weeks, but that we had gone on sale the previous Sunday, had spent close to $80,000 announcing the show and taken a full-page ad in the Sunday Los Angeles Times. How could she have missed that?

She had proven my point. And when I questioned what she watched, because I was bummed that she didn’t see or hear any of the $80,000 in media, she explained that she listened to NPR, hadn’t read the Times as she was out of town (she read it over the Internet) and really doesn’t watch much TV.

The lesson: Go where the consumer is. Do not expect them to come to you.

The flip side to that story is Bon Jovi in Boston. We pushed Dave Marsden and Clear Channel to taking the show into Foxboro Stadium. They would have preferred two nights at the shed; imagine that. But, they went along with the artist, not begrudgingly, but it took a real effort.

Two weeks out, they were looking at a six figure loss and, of course, the obligatory “Can we get any help on the guarantee?” call came in.

We all agreed not to have that discussion and instead management, our marketing guru Alli McGregor, Dave Marsden and his marketing people got on the phone to dissect the last two weeks of the campaign.

And everything from contests, to interviews, to giveaways, to promotions with the New England Patriots – you name it – was put into place. The show went into percentage, everyone was thrilled and everyone contributed to the process.

Click for larger imageThe punch line to the story, and I mean this as a compliment to Dave, was that he called the next day, said thank you for all the help from the agency and management and added, “I wish I could spend this much
time and put in this much energy on every show. What a difference it would make.”

Don’t get me wrong. I am not blaming the promoters or their marketers; it is not their fault nor is it their responsibility alone to fix the problem. They put in tremendous effort given the volume. It is just an observation that an innovative approach to a campaign might change the outcome.

So first, we looked at our audience. Second, we looked at our marketing system and acknowledged that the traditional methods weren’t nearly as effective or as cost efficient as we wanted. Yet, with our knowledge of the power of the computer and with all the names existing between ticketing companies, promoters, labels and bands, we have not found an innovative way of tapping that resource.

- Click to continue to page 5 -


Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6